Findings:
Formative: Did the project get implemented?
The project did get implemented as planned for 2 weeks. Then I had to give up the computer lab to a science teacher for the rest of the year. I made a complicated schedule to still get all my students on the program using just my 2 classroom computers, but then we had IOWA standardized testing, which changed everyone’s schedule for 2 weeks. After that, we will be having changes in schedules because of field trips and end of the year activities, so many of my students will not get to use the program as often as I would like them to.
Summative: Was this program successful?
All of my students have shown upwards growth in just 2 weeks, meaning they are completing lessons and moving on to more difficult lessons. I am impressed that some of them have completed over 50 lessons in just 2 weeks! They are also showing increased awareness of phonics in their daily work ("oh, that's a silent e word, you can't hear the e," "that has a blend like 'ship'." etc). I will use the BRI and the SORT to assess student progress near the end of May to see how much growth they have made. I will compare their rate of growth before and after using the program to see how much of a difference it really made.
Implications: What would I do next time?
Clearly, I will also start the program when school starts, not 10 weeks from the end of the school year. Unfortunately, March was the first time I could get enough grant money to order the licenses for the program. I would like to have a set time in the computer lab when I can take all participating students and have them work for 30 minutes. I would also like to have enough licenses so that all struggling readers and English Language Learners in our school could participate. I could easily use all 28 computers in the lab for students to participate, and it would still only take 30 minutes of my time and of precious computer lab time.
I would also like to create a set level system of rewards before students start the program, in order to help them see that they can earn rewards for completing hundreds of lessons. For example, this year I am giving students a can of pop (diet, caffeine free!) after they complete 100 lessons, and a pizza lunch when they complete 200 lessons! This is motivating students to complete lessons at home so they can get the significant rewards, in addition to the colored tokens they earn on the computer for successfully completing each lesson.
What should other people know before implementing a similar project?
It will definitely be useful to give the specific Explode the Code assessment before placing students on their beginning levels.
Because some students do not excel at this type of program, it cannot be the only phonics teaching happening in the classroom. One student was stuck on a very low level for quite a long time. Clearly, this program is not the end-all, be-all to phonics instruction, but it can be a useful part of it!
What would I do differently with a similar project?
Start at beginning of school year.
Reserve computer lab time as soon as possible.
Get more licenses to serve more students
Meet with parents at beginning of year to show them the program. This will increase use at home.
Give Explode the Code assessment prior to assigning starting levels.
Reward level system.
Showing posts with label evaluation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label evaluation. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)